Tale
England, 1875
A century after Victor Frankenstein’s doomed experiment, his journals have traded hands for decades.. William and Liza mention Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson – yet the film is set in 1875, 12 years before the publication of the first Holmes story, but this could be a joking reference to imply that Holmes and Watson are real people..
Sounds fairly interesting and the overall concept is solid
This is a Frankenstein follow up ??.A woman gets hold of Dr. Frankensteins diary and recreates his experiment on her husband to cure him 100 years after Frankensteins original monster. This diary has been sought after by many but a secret group are trying to locate the diary and destroy it for good as it goes against nature and god.
Phillip Martin Brown does a decent job here but not enough to carry the film
1800s. The dialogue is a bit wooden however like a stage show, I’m pretty sure this is down to both the writing and the poor way in which the actors deliver the lines attempting to sound authentic from that Era. There are some experienced and decent actors here but I never felt they embraced the ideology or the era properly.
Honestly I’d skip it even if you have Prime, unless you are a huge Frankenstein fan but then you might hate it even more
The way in which it was shot also removed an authentic feel and resembled a higher image quality version of a 90s tv movie.I watched this to see Michelle Ryan as I liked her in Eastenders and the she did Bionic Woman and then her career fizzled out.She appeared later in the film in a limited role. There were quite a few moments watching this where I chuckled at some of the poor dialogue or the poor delivery or facial over acting. 4/10.
https://miro-pisak.com/gladiator-ii-2024-web-dl-hc-download-torrent/
No responses yet